Pakistan's Missile Development Sparks Concerns in the US
A senior White House official has raised alarms over Pakistan’s advancements in long-range ballistic missile technology. Deputy National Security Adviser Jon Finer recently stated that Pakistan’s missile program has evolved significantly, with the potential to strike targets beyond South Asia, including the United States. This revelation marks a new chapter in the strained US-Pakistan relations, which have deteriorated since the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021.
Historically, Pakistan's missile and nuclear programs have been positioned as deterrents against India. However, Finer’s comments suggest a shift in perception, portraying Pakistan’s developments as an emerging global threat. He noted that while the US has engaged Pakistan on these concerns, Islamabad has been dismissive, alleging bias in US policies. The US recently imposed sanctions on Pakistan’s state-run defense agency overseeing its missile programs, aiming to curb further advancements.
Pakistan's growing ties with China, a frequent supplier for its missile program, have further complicated the dynamics. US concerns extend to larger rocket engines under development in Pakistan, which are seen as a step toward intercontinental missile capabilities. Finer's remarks indicate a decade-long timeline for these missiles to pose a direct threat to US territory, but the urgency to address these issues is evident.
Despite their Cold War-era partnership and Pakistan’s role in the US-led counterterrorism efforts, relations between the two nations have fluctuated due to Pakistan’s internal politics and its alignment with the Taliban. The US also perceives its increasing defense collaboration with China as a significant concern.
The speech surprised experts globally and signifies a critical moment in international relations. While Pakistan frames its missile program as vital for regional stability, the US sees it as an unnecessary escalation that could disrupt global security. This development underscores the need for diplomatic engagements and stricter international oversight to address the potential threats.
Refrence From: www.ndtv.com