Chief Justice Corrects Lawyer Over Humorous Name Mix-Up in Supreme Court
In a light-hearted courtroom moment, Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud found himself correcting a lawyer who mistakenly referred to Justice Hrishikesh Roy as "Justice Hrishikesh Mukherjee," confusing the judge with the legendary filmmaker behind iconic films like Anand and Gol Maal. The Chief Justice's sharp response, reminding the lawyer to "know your judges," added humor to the proceedings. This slip-up led to a playful reminder about courtroom professionalism while recalling the lasting legacy of filmmaker Hrishikesh Mukherjee.
The Scene Unfolds
During the Supreme Court hearing, the lawyer casually mentioned “Justice Hrishikesh Mukherjee” while discussing a past ruling. Chief Justice Chandrachud quickly interrupted, quipping that the lawyer must be referring to Justice Hrishikesh Roy. The Chief Justice's rebuke—“This is the limit!”—was delivered with a light-hearted tone, drawing attention to the need for precision in court, while the reference to Mukherjee evoked a laugh due to the cinematic legacy he left behind.
Hrishikesh Roy, who took his Supreme Court oath in 2019, was inadvertently confused with the legendary Hrishikesh Mukherjee. Mukherjee was known for his films that blended heartfelt storytelling and humor, crafting iconic films that resonated across generations. His works like Gol Maal, Chupke Chupke, and Anand are considered timeless pieces of Indian cinema.
The Importance of Courtroom Decorum
While this incident provided a moment of laughter, it also underscored a vital principle in the legal profession: lawyers must remain aware of the judges they address and the cases they refer to. The exchange reflected how even the smallest errors, like misnaming a judge, can draw attention to the professionalism expected in courtrooms.
Hrishikesh Mukherjee’s Cinematic Legacy
The lawyer's mix-up might have been an innocent error, but it brought a spotlight to the genius of Hrishikesh Mukherjee, whose films tackled serious themes with a gentle touch of humor. Movies like Anand depicted life’s fragility, while Gol Maal showcased situational comedy that has stood the test of time.
Mukherjee’s films are often seen as perfect examples of middle cinema, balancing commercial appeal with artistic depth. The laughter in the courtroom reminded many of the joy his films continue to bring, even years after his passing in 2006.
Conclusion
The courtroom exchange involving Chief Justice Chandrachud and the mistaken reference to Hrishikesh Mukherjee highlighted the importance of accuracy in legal discourse. Yet, it also inadvertently paid homage to one of India’s most beloved filmmakers, whose works continue to inspire and entertain. For anyone watching, it was a reminder of how humor can ease tension, even in the most formal of settings.
Reference From: www.ndtv.com